<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Good for Forests &#187; Steven Koehn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/tag/steven-koehn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodforforests.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:35:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Trade Outlets Call to Open LEED</title>
		<link>http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/579</link>
		<comments>http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/579#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Wood Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Leavell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LBM Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Goergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Koehn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodforforests.com/?p=579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may have seen recent coverage in Canadian Wood Products and the LBM Journal that point to reasons as to why the US Green Building Council should open the LEED rating system. As the single largest forest certification standard in the world, SFI is committed to promoting responsible forest management in North America and responsible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have seen recent coverage in <a href="http://www.sfiprogram.org/files/pdf/Ca_Wood_Products_Mag.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Canadian Wood Products</em></a><em> </em>and the <a href="http://www.sfiprogram.org/files/pdf/LBM%20Journal_SFIvsFSC.pdf" target="_blank"><em>LBM Journal</em></a> that point to reasons as to why the US Green Building Council should open the LEED rating system. As<strong> </strong>the single largest forest certification standard in the world, SFI is committed to promoting responsible forest management in North America and responsible fiber sourcing worldwide. We think opening LEED is a crucial step in advancing responsible forestry and strengthening green building in the U.S. and Canada.</p>
<p>SFI <em>Canadian Wood Products</em> Editor Bill Tice states, “The Sustainable Forestry Initiative Inc. (SFI) is taking a leadership role and has been the most outspoken when it comes to raising awareness that the USGBC’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system needs to recognize all credible certification programs.” He also points out that we’re not alone, listing significant support from Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, National Association of State Foresters President Steven Koehn, Mother Nature Network Director of Environmental Affairs Chuck Leavell and Society of American Foresters President Michael Goergen, among others.</p>
<p>In the <em>LBM Journal</em> article titled “SFI vs. FSC”, John Wagner brings up another valid point in regards to inclusivity. “Does the freezing out of SFI (and other standards) foster greener, more sustainably harvested lumber and wood fiber? No, it doesn’t.” At SFI, we believe that in order to better promote and increase green building projects, as well as benefit the North American economy, LEED must open their standard to all credible forest certification standards.</p>
<p>I want to thank you for your continued efforts dedicated to advancing the USGBC’s policy to one that recognizes multiple forest certification standards including SFI. With changes to LEED being decided in coming weeks, we encourage you to voice support now more than ever. Circulate articles like those previously mentioned to those who support green building and the forestry community. Encourage friends and colleagues to sign the <a href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/leed/" target="_blank">petition</a> if they haven’t already. As we engage in the USGBC process, we want to ensure we do everything we can to make sure USGBC voters and the general public have accurate information about our program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/579/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forest Experts in the US and Canada Ask USGBC to Open LEED</title>
		<link>http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/533</link>
		<comments>http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/533#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Tree Farm System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne LeBrun Ruff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Institute of Forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Stewardship Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Pineau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Fedrizzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Koehn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Forestry Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodforforests.com/?p=533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two major North American groups representing forestry experts have weighed in with the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) on the LEED standard.  Steven Koehn, president of the National Association of State Foresters (NASF), recently wrote a letter to USGBC CEO &#38; Founding Chairman Rick Fedrizzi stating that the revised standard should:


Enhance incentives to recognize wood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two major North American groups representing forestry experts have weighed in with the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) on the LEED standard.  Steven Koehn, president of the National Association of State Foresters (NASF), recently wrote a <a href="http://www.stateforesters.org/node/1760" target="_blank">letter</a> to USGBC CEO &amp; Founding Chairman Rick Fedrizzi stating that the revised standard should:</p>
<div style="margin-left:20px">
<ol>
<li><em>Enhance incentives to recognize wood as a renewable      resource and preferred building material</em></li>
<li><em>Eliminate criteria that discriminate against wood by      not equally and fully considering environmental impacts of alternate      materials such as steel and concrete</em></li>
<li><em>Enhance incentives to recognize the environmental      benefits of locally produced and domestically produced wood over imported      wood and substitute materials</em></li>
<li><em>Provide incentives to broaden exemplary forestry      practices by equally rewarding the American Tree Farm System (ATFS), the      Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), the Sustainable Forestry Initiative      (SFI), and other credible forest certification systems. </em></li>
</ol>
</div>
<p>The NASF is comprised of directors of forestry agencies across the U.S. and promotes forest conservation and sustainable forestry.</p>
<p>Additionally, Mr. Fedrizzi has received a <a href="http://www.cif-ifc.org/uploads/Website_Assets/USGB_letter_final.pdf" target="_blank">letter</a> urging LEED to be more inclusive from the Canadian Institute of Forestry. The organization also put out a <a href="http://www.cif-ifc.org/uploads/Website_Assets/USGB_media_release_April_19_2010.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a> about the LEED issue. President Anne LeBrun Ruff and Executive Director John F. Pineau state,</p>
<p>“<em>Even though Canada has over 40% of the certified land globally, only 10% of the world’s forests are certified. Yet private and some government agencies are still splitting hairs over specific aspects of forest management certification systems. In doing this, the focus on the overall goal of sustainable management is lost. Each standard has a different background and assesses planning and practices in a slightly different way. However, the end result of sustainably managed forests is the same, which leads us to the issue at hand.</em>”</p>
<p>They also make the vital point that wood is a smart choice for green building, yet many of its positive aspects are not recognized in the LEED rating system.</p>
<p>I’m pleased that the NASF and Canadian Institute of Forestry have taken a stand on the LEED issue. At SFI, we hope Mr. Fedrizzi and the rest of the USGBC listen to what the rest of the forestry community already knows—an inclusive stance better supports responsible forestry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goodforforests.com/archives/533/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

